<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiat-Chrysler Announces Electric Car and Plug-In Hybrid Truck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviews.carreview.com/fiat-chrysler-announces-electric-car-and-plug-in-hybrid-truck/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/fiat-chrysler-announces-electric-car-and-plug-in-hybrid-truck</link>
	<description>Car reviews, feature articles, and auto news at CarReview.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulisse di bartolomei</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/fiat-chrysler-announces-electric-car-and-plug-in-hybrid-truck#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ulisse di bartolomei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=15157#comment-1182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fiat patent fraud. About the Fiat hybrids, the technology double clutch with electric motor between has been stolen by a patent that Fiat Company has never wanted to purchase, but only shamelessly to copy. I invite to visit my blog where her &quot;vitality&quot; and boldness of the Fiat planners it appears in all of evidence: http://dualsymbioticelectromechanicalengine.blogspot.com/
If the industries can afford unpunished to copy the ideas and defending it need very expensive trial, to which target need the patents? How our young people can find intellectual courage if the economic potentates crush the rights of the single ones? How to defend the rights of private inventors? Whoever is about to ask for a patent or wants to propose a proper patent to a great firm I suggest to give a look to my experience with the Fiat, to get able to operate with best adroitness. Thanks and good time to everybody. Ulisse Di Bartolomei]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fiat patent fraud. About the Fiat hybrids, the technology double clutch with electric motor between has been stolen by a patent that Fiat Company has never wanted to purchase, but only shamelessly to copy. I invite to visit my blog where her &#8220;vitality&#8221; and boldness of the Fiat planners it appears in all of evidence: <a href="http://dualsymbioticelectromechanicalengine.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://dualsymbioticelectromechanicalengine.blogspot.com/</a><br />
If the industries can afford unpunished to copy the ideas and defending it need very expensive trial, to which target need the patents? How our young people can find intellectual courage if the economic potentates crush the rights of the single ones? How to defend the rights of private inventors? Whoever is about to ask for a patent or wants to propose a proper patent to a great firm I suggest to give a look to my experience with the Fiat, to get able to operate with best adroitness. Thanks and good time to everybody. Ulisse Di Bartolomei</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Important</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/fiat-chrysler-announces-electric-car-and-plug-in-hybrid-truck#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Important]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=15157#comment-1181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most writers do not explain Federal law demands US carmakers to make a ZEV by a certain date; electric cars are not a mere novelty. GM and Chrysler both warred California in the courts from about &#039;98 to &#039;07 over Federal emission credits for electric cars. Since GM&#039;s EV 1 became illegal, they crushed them. So Cal did prevent US consumers from having electric cars! And... California went bankrupt instead. Check the dates for yourself. Hence, since GM and Chrysler battled Cal on behalf of Federal law, what is commonly called a bailout by all the talking heads  is rather more accurately called compensation. Swartzneger people ended the Cal electric car battle by passing certain laws, late &#039;07? -They passed legislation to help Tesla Motors also.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most writers do not explain Federal law demands US carmakers to make a ZEV by a certain date; electric cars are not a mere novelty. GM and Chrysler both warred California in the courts from about &#8217;98 to &#8217;07 over Federal emission credits for electric cars. Since GM&#8217;s EV 1 became illegal, they crushed them. So Cal did prevent US consumers from having electric cars! And&#8230; California went bankrupt instead. Check the dates for yourself. Hence, since GM and Chrysler battled Cal on behalf of Federal law, what is commonly called a bailout by all the talking heads  is rather more accurately called compensation. Swartzneger people ended the Cal electric car battle by passing certain laws, late &#8217;07? -They passed legislation to help Tesla Motors also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pimpbot</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/fiat-chrysler-announces-electric-car-and-plug-in-hybrid-truck#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pimpbot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=15157#comment-1180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[apostrophe fail

EV Win]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apostrophe fail</p>
<p>EV Win</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
