Driving Impressions: 2007 Honda Civic Si Sedan
by Tony S.
Pros:
- Handling
- Interior and Exterior Design
- Sweet, High-revving Motor
Cons:
- Low Torque
- Terrible Speedometer Placement
A lot of words come to mind when thinking of Honda four-doors: practical, reliable, dependable, and mostly boring. There’s nothing wrong with making that type of vehicle….Honda has sold millions of them. But what do you do if you’re looking for a little sport in an economical and practical four-door and you don’t want to break the bank. Well, you could start off by looking at the four-door Honda Civic Si.
Conditions for the test drive were incredible (isn’t the Bay Area great), with clear skies and eighty to ninety-degree temperatures. I drove a combination of highway, city surface streets, and winding back roads. I think the conditions in which we tested the car will be consistent with how most people will drive the car.
Build
This is the 2007 Honda Civic Si Sedan. It comes equipped with a 4 cylinder 2.0 liter motor that pumps out 197 horsepower at 7800 RPM and 139 pound-feet of torque at 6100 RPM. The motor is mated to a six-speed manual transmission. Power is delivered to the road via a front-wheel drive system with a limited slip differential ending in 17 inch, split five spoke alloy rims shod with Michelin Pilot P215/45R17 tires.
Fit and finish is normal Honda excellence. The body panels align properly and the doors close securely.
Interior Comfort and Ergonomics
The Si has a very modern looking interior, with flowing lines and an intelligent design. The instruments are easily visible behind a three spoke steering wheel and the controls are easy to understand and use. However, I did find one area of major concern. The speedometer is placed at the top of a double-stack instrument cluster and is almost impossible to read under direct sunlight. While this design is very distinctive and attractive, it loses points for practicality and is a little disappointing considering normally excellent Honda engineering.
The cloth covered seats are firm and have side bolsters that do a commendable job keeping you in place during spirited driving. This makes for a fairly sporting seat that maintains an appreciable comfort factor. The cloth material which adorns the seats and other surface areas of the interior is very attractive, but acts like Velcro with hair and other debris. Keeping this interior clean will require a little more effort than leather or vinyl. Rear seat leg room is adequate, but becomes a bit crunched when the front seats are place in the full rear position.
The rear seats fold down to provide additional cargo area, but if you want to carry bicycles or other large items, a roof rack will be in order.
It appears that Honda may have left out a little insulation in the interests of keeping this car light. It’s not exactly noisy, just a little more noisy than most cars at this price level.
Performance
The Civic Si boasts a197 horsepower i-VTEC engine with 139 pound-feet of torque….yaaawn. Where’s the sport in this Civic Si? Wait a minute,…I’m starting to feel something. There it is, just had to get over 6,000 rpm to find it. All kidding aside, this is a very nice little motor. Smooth, high-revving, and no quit. This motor is well-served by its six speed manual. Stir the gear-box frequently and keep the RPMs over 6,000 and this is a fun ride. This car makes you want to accelerate just to hear that great exhaust note. Not bad at all for a normally aspirated 2.0 liter.
I did notice that the shifting on this vehicle felt a bit vague. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the transmission, it could just use a better shifting linkage that would allow more positive shifts.
Handling
Honda did a good job with the handling and ride quality of this vehicle. The ride itself is firm without being harsh or jarring. Handling is confidence inspiring and the Michelins are predictable and forgiving. There is some minor body roll during left to right transitions, but nothing that would prevent you from enjoying some spirited driving. I tested this vehicle on Calaveras Road, which sports some very narrow, tight turns, and very little room for error. This is the same road on which I tested the Ford Shelby Mustang several weeks back. The Honda is much easier to drive fast under these conditions. Given the same driver, the Honda would beat the Mustang on this road. Braking power is good and I experienced no fade under our limited test conditions.
Styling
Honda Civic sedans have always been fairly boxy in nature and it seems that Honda has always been satisfied to leave it to the aftermarket to improve this car’s looks. Not the case with this Civic sedan. The exterior design is smooth and flowing. And the Si package looks like it originated in the aftermarket. Nothing too crazy, but eye-catching none-the-less. I think they did a great job with the exterior design of this vehicle. It looks very modern and should age well.
Value
The MSRP for this vehicle is $22,085. If this vehicle is as reliable as other Civics have been through the years, it will be a great value. Well designed, sporting, good looks, and fairly practical.
Ratings
Solid engineering and excellent fit and finish deserve a 4 in the build category.
Flowing lines and quality materials earn this vehicle a 3.5 in the interior category. It would have been 4, but the speedometer looses half a point.
4 points in the performance category for a free revving, smooth, fun to drive motor.
Handling and ride quality that are consistent with what you should expect of a vehicle that is marketed as sporting earn this car 4 for handling. With more torque and a quieter ride, this vehicle could have earned a 5.
Modern styling that should remain fresh for years, 4 points for styling.
If this car is as reliable as its siblings, it will prove to be a great value and earns 4.5 points.
|
|
Build |
Interior |
Performance |
Handling |
Style |
Value |
Overall |
|
Rating |
4 |
3.5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4.5 |
4.0/B |
Conclusion
This car is about having your cake and getting to eat it too. Keep the motor revving at a reasonable limit, and you have an efficient vehicle good for commuting. The four doors make it practical for family transportation. It’s a Honda and should prove reliable and long-lasting. On the other side, its interior and exterior styling don’t scream, “I’m a practical car,” and the motor and handling package available with this vehicle give it a very high fun factor for more daring drivers.
So you say you want a practical vehicle for the work week and a back-road burner for the weekends, this Honda may just be the car for you.
On a side note, I would like to sincerely thank a good friend for allowing us to drive his brand new Civic with less than 1,300 miles on it. Thanks for trusting us with your new ride, Jason.
>> See all of the Honda Civic pictures in our photo gallery
>> Read more Honda Civic reviews submitted by the CarREVIEW.com community
>> 2007 Honda Civic Si specs and observed gas mileage
>> Honda Civic videos
>> Links to more Honda Civic reviews on other sites
anthony5150





July 29th, 2007 at 10:22 pm
Nice review. Did you forget to mention it requires premium gas? I couldn’t see where you mentioned that.
July 30th, 2007 at 11:03 am
Whoops! You are right - the Civic Si uses 91 octane fuel. I have a K20A2 engine in my ‘02 RSX and that uses premium gas, also. The ‘05 RSX Type S and Civic Si share the same engine, K20Z1.
August 31st, 2007 at 8:59 pm
Oh yea the engine is the k20z3 in the civic si 06 and up. Just thought i would let you know so you could correct that.
September 20th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
some of these reviews say the Si can “only” use premium gas, i have an Si coupe, and i put the high octane in but the car runs fine on regular. also, im not sure if i just suck at quick shifting, but sometimes, when i am, i miss 2nd gear and grind it. i saw in a different review that it happens sometimes, just wonderin… but, i think you did a great job with the review, and the rating system you did was sweet. but overall i love the car, and i think it has alot of potential. i am just wondering what would be better to put into it, a turbo, or a supercharger. thanks…. John
September 20th, 2007 at 5:29 pm
The ECU programming is setup for for a lower grade fuel, but the 91 octane is preferred to avoid pinging or pre-detonation. You have a hi-performance engine and it should be treated with the best available gas.
Sorry, I can’t suggest a supercharger or turbo either way. I prefer normally aspirated engines because of the faster throttle response and reliability factor. Although, I admit forced induction is the way to go if you are into racing on the track.
October 4th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
hey thanks for gettin back to me. i have couple more questions. first off, what is th difference between vtech, and i-vtech? next, im looking to get a controller for it. however, im not so sure if i should. i dont wanna take the risk of voiding my warranty or breaking my engine. thanks again.
JOhn
October 4th, 2007 at 8:18 pm
VTEC is the valve timing and lift control technology that Honda uses with their high performance engines (K20A, B16A, EK3 D15B)to squeeze more power out of a small engine, but still get good fuel economy numbers. I can get 30 MPG overall in my ‘02 RSX if I keep my speed down near the posted speed limit. iVTEC is VTEC + VTC (Variable Timing Control) which allows for dynamic/continuous intake valve timing and overlap control
to optimize power, torque, fuel economy and emissions. You can read more about iVTEC at http://asia.vtec.net/article/k20a/
If I understand your question correctly, Hondata is my preference for ECU modification and enhancement.
January 10th, 2008 at 1:29 am
And just about EVERY car manufacturer uses some sort of variable valve timing, one of Subaru’s technologies is basically identical to VTEC, just the Hondas don’t seem to produce much torque and suffer from very tinny, whiny engines. As far as a sporty econocar, its not a bad package except for the wedge-of-cheese exterior, Fisher-Price interior, whiny engine note, vague shifting, and complete lack of torque. There’s no reason to put high-octane fuel in the SI. Keep the revving within reason and the car should perform fine. Apparently a terrible car to try to “tune”. Bigger wheels/tires don’t help the low torque engine or economy. You could tweak the handling but you’re still driving essentially one of the most efficient econocars on the road. If one is looking for the optimal Civic variant, the hybrid takes much better advantage of the Civic’s offerings…