<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Volvo XC60 Review &#8211; Safety in a sexy package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package</link>
	<description>Car reviews, feature articles, and auto news at CarReview.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: traffic service</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package#comment-71479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[traffic service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=6176#comment-71479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;traffic service...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]2010 Volvo XC60 Review &#8211; Safety in a sexy package &#124; Car Reviews and news at CarReview.com[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>traffic service&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]2010 Volvo XC60 Review &#8211; Safety in a sexy package | Car Reviews and news at CarReview.com[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: water trampoline accessories</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package#comment-59480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[water trampoline accessories]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=6176#comment-59480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;water trampoline accessories...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]2010 Volvo XC60 Review &#8211; Safety in a sexy package &#124; Car Reviews and news at CarReview.com[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>water trampoline accessories&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]2010 Volvo XC60 Review &#8211; Safety in a sexy package | Car Reviews and news at CarReview.com[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 03:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=6176#comment-676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Absolutely poor gas mileage in the city – 10-11 mpg. Comparing to my previous Volkswagen Passat 2.0T – never been less then 22 mpg in the city.&quot;

Look at truedelta or fueleconomy gov for more reliable info.  You must have a lead foot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Absolutely poor gas mileage in the city – 10-11 mpg. Comparing to my previous Volkswagen Passat 2.0T – never been less then 22 mpg in the city.&#8221;</p>
<p>Look at truedelta or fueleconomy gov for more reliable info.  You must have a lead foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=6176#comment-675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to disagree with the comment about the Volvo Nav system. WE have a 2003 S60 and a 2010 XC60 and the Volvo nav is the easiest, quickest, and has more features for finding facilities and destinations than any other factory nav we have ever seen. Our 2007 Cadillac STS has the worst factory nav we have ever seen. it is touch screen, so you can not see audio functions while in nav mode, you can not use the nav when the car is in motion, you can not set a destination and then find facilities along the route (like gas, rest stop, etc).

The Volvo is quick and easy to use.  And you are wrong also when you say only the driver can set a destination frome the steering wheel. The car comes with a hand held remote that anyone else in the car (front or back seats) can use to set the destination while the car is moving.

We have use navs in Audi, Mercedes, GM, and Porsche.  The Volvo is simply the best.  It does not have voice commands, probably because voice commands rarely work unless the car is stationary and the engine is turned off. The Cadillac voice commands don&#039;t work for the nav, or the windows, or the heater, or anything else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with the comment about the Volvo Nav system. WE have a 2003 S60 and a 2010 XC60 and the Volvo nav is the easiest, quickest, and has more features for finding facilities and destinations than any other factory nav we have ever seen. Our 2007 Cadillac STS has the worst factory nav we have ever seen. it is touch screen, so you can not see audio functions while in nav mode, you can not use the nav when the car is in motion, you can not set a destination and then find facilities along the route (like gas, rest stop, etc).</p>
<p>The Volvo is quick and easy to use.  And you are wrong also when you say only the driver can set a destination frome the steering wheel. The car comes with a hand held remote that anyone else in the car (front or back seats) can use to set the destination while the car is moving.</p>
<p>We have use navs in Audi, Mercedes, GM, and Porsche.  The Volvo is simply the best.  It does not have voice commands, probably because voice commands rarely work unless the car is stationary and the engine is turned off. The Cadillac voice commands don&#8217;t work for the nav, or the windows, or the heater, or anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k.w</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k.w]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=6176#comment-674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they have diesel version! pretty worthy!!! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they have diesel version! pretty worthy!!! <img src="http://reviews.carreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://reviews.carreview.com/2010-volvo-xc60-review-safety-in-a-sexy-package#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.carreview.com/?p=6176#comment-673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely poor gas mileage in the city - 10-11 mpg. Comparing to my previous Volkswagen Passat 2.0T - never been less then 22 mpg in the city.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely poor gas mileage in the city &#8211; 10-11 mpg. Comparing to my previous Volkswagen Passat 2.0T &#8211; never been less then 22 mpg in the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
